Bookmark and Share
View as Web Page Subscribe Unsubscribe Send to a Friend
Share on Facebook Bookmark and Share  
January 2015
 
Less Than Six Hundred Seventy Days Left              
Federal Election Campaign Funding
 
Depending on when you read this, we are about 670 days away from the 2016 U.S. presidential elections. Why should prospect researchers and major gift officers care about the election? The answer is simple: Research shows that federal election campaign contributors are more likely to make charitable gifts—some studies indicate they are 14 times more likely to give than the average person. See my blog of April 30, 2013 (from the side navigation bar, click on Top Five Indicators of Philanthropy) and Donor Search’s Prospect Research Statistics for more about federal election contributions as a philanthropy indicator.
 
Given the charitable nature of campaign contributors, researchers and major gift officers may find good information about federal election contributors at the following two websites:
There are rules concerning who may give to political candidates, how much they can give, and to whom they can give; we need to understand those rules in order to better understand contributions made by our prospects.
 
Only American citizens (and immigrants with green cards) may contribute to federal politics. Prior to the 2010 Supreme Court’s decision Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission, corporations and unions were not able to contribute to political campaigns. Technically, these groups are still not allowed to contribute directly to a candidate or a political party, however through Super PACs (Political Action Committees), these groups may contribute an unlimited amount of money as long as they don’t coordinate the Super PAC’s action with the candidate.
 
Let’s take a look at the contribution limits:
 
Limits for individuals:
  • Up to $2,600 per candidate per election (primaries or general or special) directly to the candidate
  • Up to $32,400 to national parties each calendar year
  • Up to $5,000 to a PAC per calendar year
  • Unlimited amount to Super PACs
  • Unlimited amounts to 527s.
Limits for corporations, unions, associations, and other organizations:
  • Unlimited amount to Super PACs
  • Unlimited amounts to 527s.
What is the difference between a PAC and a Super PAC? PACs generally represent business, labor unions, or specific beliefs/interests, and PAC money generally comes from voluntary contributions. PACs are also known as “separate segregated funds” because, while a corporation may not directly contribute to a PAC, a corporation may start and maintain a PAC as a separate and segregated fund. For example, a labor union PAC generally receives contributions from union members rather than union treasuries. PACs can give $5,000 to a candidate/committee per election (primary, general, or special) and PACs may give up to $15,000 annually to any national party committee. PACs may also give up to $5,000 annually to any other PAC. PACs may receive up to $5,000 from any one individual, another PAC, or party committee per calendar year. American divisions of foreign companies may also form PACs, but those divisions may collect contributions only from their American employees.
 
Super PACs, technically known as “independent expenditure-only committees,” may spend unlimited sums of money to overtly advocate for or against political candidates, however, Super PACs may not give directly to a candidate or political party. There are no limits or restrictions on the sources of funds for Super PACS; individuals, corporations, associations, unions, and other organizations may contribute unlimited amounts of money to Super PACs. Super PACs are rapidly proliferating; as of January 6, 2015, over 1,280 groups have organized as Super PACs.
 
Both PACs and Super PACs have Federal Election Commission mandatory reporting requirements, which include disclosing the names of contributors.
 
Now let’s turn our attention to the 527, which is a group created primarily to influence the selection, nomination, election, appointment, or defeat of candidates to federal, state, or local public office. Political parties and campaign committees for candidates for federal, state, or local office, and political action committees may file for tax exemption under Internal Revenue Code section 527. Since they are advocacy groups whose activities may not instruct the voter to vote for or against a specific candidate, 527s often will try to shape your opinion of a political candidate or party in the context of a specific issue. Such organizations can raise unlimited funds from individuals, corporations, or labor unions, but these organizations must register with the IRS and disclose their contributions and expenditures.
 
Technically, all PACs and Super PACs are 527s, but because PACs and Super PACs are regulated by federal and/or state campaign finance laws, they are generally referred to as PACs; the term 527 is often reserved for those organizations that are not regulated under state or federal campaign finance laws because they do not expressly advocate for a candidate. Click here to search for 527 contributors.
 
Future trends
 
In the recent 2014 mid-term elections, there was increased spending by dark money nonprofits, a descriptive phrase referring to there being no requirement to disclose—or bring to light—public donations. Dark money nonprofits are typically 501(c)(4) social welfare nonprofits which have no requirement to publicly disclose donor names and are only required to disclose their congressional-race spending within 60 days of House and Senate elections and their presidential-race spending following the national party conventions. According to IRS regulations, the nonprofit’s primary purpose cannot be to influence elections, but the group can spend up to half of its money on political campaigning. The Sunlight Foundation, which has been following this trend, reported that “Through November 1 [2012], at least $213.0 million has been spent in the general election by dark money groups to influence the 2012 elections.” While the $213 million is less than half of the money spent by Super PACs, it is likely that it will continue to increase in future elections. Last year, the IRS issued revisions for 501(c)(4) reporting of contributions, but it quickly withdrew the revisions because of criticism from both those who favor disclosure of contributions and those who do not.  The IRS is expected to release new rules for 501(c)(4) dark money contributions, but pundits don’t expect those revisions to be issued until after the 2016 Presidential election.
 
In putting together this article, I turned to the following resources, which I list for your further use:
One final note for my prospect research readers…
 
My federal elections campaign financing research uncovered the top 10 companies the presidential candidates used in the 2012 election cycle for list generating. You will most likely recognize many on the list (presented in order of the most dollars spent to the least dollars spent by the candidates):
  1. CMDI
  2. NGP
  3. Lexis Nexis
  4. Walter Karl
  5. Preferred Communications
  6. Blue State Digital
  7. Data Trust
  8. Pinnacle List Company
  9. FLS Connect
  10. Infogroup
 
Part-time Temporary Development Office Position
 
The Hospitaller Brothers of St. John of God
 
The Hospitaller Brothers of St. John of God is seeking a part-time temporary Development Coordinator. The job involves three main areas:
  • Assisting with clerical functions, especially correspondence and “white mail” acknowledgements;
  • Sharing in the tasks of the production side (versus the creative side) of our direct mail programs;
  • Helping with our fledgling social media efforts (Facebook, Constant Contact).
To learn more about this position or to apply, please contact:
 
Christopher Jungers, CFRE
Executive Director
Hospitaller Brothers of St. John of God Development Corporation
1145 Delsea Drive,
Westville, NJ 08093-0490
Phone: 856.845.7030
 
Suggestions?
 
Send us your comments.
 
I welcome your ideas, comments, and suggestions.
 
If you've enjoyed this issue of my newsletter, please tweet about it, send it to a friend, or otherwise pass the newsletter on to your friends, family, and colleagues.
 
Sincerely,
 
Marge
 
Margaret King
President, InfoRich Group, Inc.
484-461-8100
 
 
Do You Want To Jump Start Your Fundraising Campaign?
 
Do you want to find the best prospects for major gifts among your existing donors?
 
Electronic wealth screenings are used to help quickly and cost-effectively identify the best prospects from your donor pool.
 
Wealth screening compares your prospects to more than 25 databases to provide insight into the giving potential of your donors. Unlike large screening companies, InfoRich Group, Inc. will screen donor pools as small as 100 donors or as large as 2,500 donors. Our screening results are immediately actionable because we screen the data, analyze it, and then segment it so that you know where and with whom to spend your time and energy.
 
For larger screenings, we can help you select the right company for your needs to provide your screening.

Do you want to find the best prospects for major gifts or planned giving among your existing donors?
 
Contact us now for a free quote.
 
Prospect Research Glossary
 
Would you like a prospect research glossary for FREE?
 
The Prospect Research Institute is offering a free PDF file of the glossary from its "Introduction to Profiles" course.
 
But act quickly!  The offer is available only until January 16.
 
 
(c) Copyright 2015 InfoRich Group, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Do you want to share our original articles?
Our newsletter is protected by U.S. Copyright. Contact us for permission to share our original content. Send us the details about how you would like to re-use or quote our original content and we will process your request expeditiously.

Send your request now.
 
InfoRich Group Inc • 1005 Pontiac Drive #202 • Drexel Hill, PA 19026
http://www.inforichgroup.com
Subscribe | Unsubscribe | Send to a Friend | Preferences | Report Spam
Powered by MyNewsletterBuilder