Remember this FBI 'Going Dark' Program - Not just electronic surveillance?
FBI 'Going Dark' with New Advanced Surveillance Program
Author: Kim ZetterKim Zetter
The proposed 2010 Justice Department budget published last week reveals the development of a new FBI advanced electronic surveillance program dubbed "Going Dark." The program is being budgeted $233.9 million next year.
According to the published budget summary (.pdf), the program "supports the FBI’s electronic surveillance (ELSUR), intelligence collection and evidence gathering capabilities, as well as those of the greater Intelligence Community."
An FBI spokesman told ABC News, which first reported the information, that the program's name, Going Dark, "does not refer to a specific capability, but is a program name for the part of the FBI, Operational Technology Division's (OTD) lawful interception program which is shared with other law enforcement agencies." He added that "The term applies to the research and development of new tools, technical support and training initiatives."
The program is designed to help the agency address challenges with conducting surveillance over newish technologies, such as VoIP. The program is also doing research on automated link analysis to find connections between subjects of surveillance "and other investigative suspects."
The budget report also discusses aBiometric Technology Center that is being developed jointly by the FBI, Defense Department and Justice Department in conjunction with the University of West Virginia for research and development of biometric technologies. The center is located at the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division complex in Clarksburg, West Virginia.
The biometric project will also encompass "a vast database of personal data including fingerprints, iris scans and DNA which the FBI calls the Next Generation Identification (NGI)," according to ABC, which could be online next year. Lockheed Martin has been awarded the contract to update and maintain the database at an estimated cost of up to $1 billion a year.
"EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The public and private sectors face a growing national security concern resulting from the ability of criminals, terrorists, and state actors to obfuscate their activities by ‘going dark’1 through encryption or other means. Strong encryption ensures digital communications are protected for secure commerce and trade to strengthen cybersecurity and to safeguard private information, national security, and the global economy. Unfortunately, rapidly evolving technological advancements—particularly in digital and communications security—impede the ability of US law enforcement and the intelligence community to collect and analyze information that is critical to thwarting potential threats. The recommendations put forth in this paper are intended to help the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) tackle the going dark problem and help mitigate potential threats with help from the private sector. This collection of policy briefs cover the following target areas: Public Awareness about Going Dark …Employ public surrogates to raise the public’s awareness of the challenges imposed by encryption as lawmakers garner support for feasible and balanced mitigation strategies.
Investment in Research Beyond Encryption …Opportunities exist to mitigate the impact of encryption on intelligence collection through the exploitation of alternate sources and vulnerabilities existing within the expanding plane of open sources and Internet of Things (IoT) “digital exhaust.”2
Technical Exchanges with Industry …Technical exchanges with industry reduces capability gaps, better equipping law enforcement to make progress on collecting digital evidence from encrypted devices. Public Private Partnerships …Creating liaisons between public and private organizations is an essential element for law enforcement and the intelligence community in solving encryption issues and mitigating potential conflicts between public and private entities.
1 Hereafter, ‘going dark’ will be referred to as going dark. 2 “Digital exhaust” includes data emitted by various Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (Noyes, 2016). Hereafter, “digital exhaust” will be referred to as digital exhaust"
Uni-Sex Newsboy Hat $125.00
Insert for hatColors: Black, Navy Blue, Olive Green, Khaki
Protect your brain, wear shielding on your head and cover your cochlear implants. Blocks tuning of implants and return signals. Has been noted by some to stop subliminal intrusion and electronic dreams. Removable insert is 4 layers metallic fabric, one layer light-blocking rubber and a layer of broadcloth to protect the metal. 2 removable magnets, grounding strap, tracked shipping included, $125, except overseas (calculated by po).
INSERT ONLY $110.00, shipping included. Order by emailing CitizensAHT@protonmail.com. We will send you an invoice. Pay to paypal email: CitizensAHT@protonmail.com. Please make sure we have an email for you and a shipping address.
1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a
Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871.
With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62). The act -- passed when the country was weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War -- was a strategic move by foreign interests (international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the coffers and neck of America. Congress cut a deal with the international bankers (specifically Rothschilds of London) to incur a DEBT to said bankers. Because the bankers were not about to lend money to a floundering nation without serious stipulations, they devised a way to get their foot in the door of the United States.
The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced -- in effect vandalized and sabotage -- when the title was capitalized and the word "for" was changed to "of" in the title.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does is not! Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly "minor" alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans. What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government.
This newly altered Constitution was not intended to benefit the Republic. It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original (organic) Constitution. Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a "privilege" that requires citizens to be licensed. (Passports) By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.
The same policies used to target "terrorists" overseas are set to be used against ordinary Americans, whose electronic lives and communications are now set to be scoured for evidence of "mental illness." Andrew is a retired attorney.
by Andrew (henrymakow.com)
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) already has technology for snooping on our phone discussions, email, etc. That is covered under FISA, but now Trump and Barr want even more snooping authority.
Trump and Barr claim the DOJ has MIND READING technology to read the thoughts of 'mass shooters' and preemptively arrest them before they begin shooting. THAT'S PREPOSTEROUS!
But that exactly what Trump and Secretary of Justice, William Barr are proposing.
Following the Walmart El Paso mass shooting last August, 2019, President Trump proposed a new federal agency to be known as HARPA that would work with the Department of Justice to use "breakthrough technologies with high specificity and sensitivity for early diagnosis of neuropsychiatric violence," specifically "advanced analytical tools based on artificial intelligence and machine learning."
The data to be analyzed would be harvested from consumer electronic devices as well as information provided by health-care providers to identify who might be a threat.
Trump and Barr's Pre-Crime Program is actually designed to furnish a phoney pretext for further invasion of Americans' privacy.
Pretty soon people who voice "unauthorized narratives" (a/k/a THOUGHT CRIME LIKE CONSPIRACY THEORIES) will be subject to arrest for thinking outside the media circus of Congressional Impeachment Proceedings.
By the way, that's why the enabling legislation for HARPA sailed through Congress unnoticed by the average American. That explains the real purpose for the Impeachment Proceedings. DISTRACTION!
It is important to point out that such initiatives, whether HARPA or Barr's newly announced program, are likely to define "mental illness" to include political beliefs, given that the FBI recently stated in an internal memo "conspiracy theories" were motivating some domestic terror threats and a series of questionable academic studies have sought to link "conspiracy theorists" to mental illnesses.
Thus, the Department of Justice and "mental health professionals" have essentially already defined those who express disbelief in official government narratives as both a terror threat and mentally ill -- and thus worthy of special attention from pre-crime programs." Obviously, we're sleepwalking into an Orwellian nightmare.
This widely overlooked background is crucial to understanding William Barr's recent memorandum and the massive and greatly underreported shift in the policy it heralds. Over a period of several months, Barr -- aided by "private sector partners" as well as other current and former government officials -- has been laying the groundwork for the system he has now formally announced.
Through the software products offered by companies like Carbyne911 and through Barr's personal crusade to mandate government backdoors into encrypted software and products, Barr's new pre-crime program already has the tools for the mass extraction and storage of political and consumer data by means of both private tech companies and public services like emergency call centres.
This is a disturbing trend. In recent decades, and especially after the September 11 attacks, Americans have quietly traded an increasing number of civil liberties for increased government "counter-terrorism" programs and wars purportedly waged to "keep us safe."
Now, those same policies used to target "terrorists" overseas are set to be used against ordinary Americans, whose electronic lives and communications are now set to be scoured for evidence of "mental illness."
If these untransparent algorithms flag an individual, that could be enough lead to court-ordered "mental health treatment" or even imprisonment regardless of whether or not a crime was committed or even planned.
As a consequence, William Barr's coming "pre-crime" program is arguably worse than the stuff of dystopian science fiction novels and films as it not only aims to detain Americans who have committed no crime but will expressly target individuals based on their use of electronic consumer products and the contents of their communications with their friends, family, co-workers, and others."
Although not taught in our phoney Gone-With-The-Windhistory of the American Civil War, there were mass imprisonments of 38,000 ordinary Americans during the American Civil War (1861-1865). These prisoners were never charged with any crime. They were never tried or given a hearing.
I did some searching and find there are a fair number of articles sounding the alarm on pre-crime, but I wonder if the seriousness of this will wake up enough people to mount a big enough push back to get Trump to back down? They always rush trough the most liberty-destroying ploys in December. Remember Dec 2001? I can only hope legal eagles like Judicial Watch and MANY other America First legal types will get cracking and mount lawsuits to put the brakes on this. I felt a little bit of relief when Trump canned Bolton, and hoped he would continue in the same vein, but this is as bad as it can get. The Executive order decreeing special protective status for Jews was also a very bad omen of what's to come.
This is an important article. Andrew has once again delineated the parameters and the extremely dangerous implications implicit in Barr's Constitution-shredding, Free Speech nuking, End-of dissent-in-America, 'Pre-crime' abomination. As Andrew stated in the beginning of this article: it's PREPOSTEROUS to claim that software and AI computers could accurately predict whether someone will commit a crime - in the future. That is a Predictive Programming movie script produced & directed by Dreamland propagandist Steven Spielberg and starring Tom Cruz. It's not - and NEVER could be - reality. There's a little 'fly-in-the-ointment' that gets in the way of such idiotic presumption. It's called Free Will and we all have it - including William Barr.
However, as a pretext for installing an East Germany-style police state coercion rack, using the FEAR of being thrown into a mental hospital or prison for 'unapproved' opinions, critiques, or even THOUGTHS unacceptable to the Zio infil-traitors controlling this government, THEN you've got something that would make tribal luminaries like Marcus Wolfe or even Comrade Lazar Kaganovich EXTREMELY proud. But it wouldn't make Thomas Jefferson or Patrick Henry very proud of such a despicable betrayal of the principles upon which our Republic was founded.
The role of the Attorney General of the United States is to UPHOLD and DEFEND - for the American People - the laws passed by Congress, and most importantly, the freedoms enshrined within the first ten amendments of the US Constitution --- NOT to introduce Kafkaesque 'Pre-crime' police state, thought-control ploys to destroy the very foundations of Liberty upon which the country rests. This is an unprecedented act of treason and I can only hope that enough Americans will wake up to the gravity of what's taking place here and demand Barr's removal from office.
Unless a LOT of Americans quickly move to let Trump and their congressmen know that BOTH Barr and this "pre-crime' lunacy HAS GOT TO GO, we will soon be on a straight line trajectory towards a rebirth of East Germany in America, (and it won't be fun).
Just listened to Ron Paul's Oct 30, Live Stream on the alarming dangers we now face with Orwellian Pre-Crime plans and the never-ending, excessive militarization of American police. Good stuff.
Patriot Act On Steroids: Trump's Dangerous New 'Pre-Crime' Plan
Thousands of cops, veterans, supporters pledge to join militia in Virginia to combat unconstitutional laws Published: December 18, 2019 Share | Print This Virginia – Monday morning, Law Enforcement Today reported on how Tazewell County, Virginia is crafting a militia to defend the Constitution in the state. And within hours, we were flooded with thousands of emails from people across the state – police officers, veterans, and patriotic Americans – who said they are joining. And it’s a movement that’s gaining traction across the state. Wrote one man: “I am Vietnam vet, ex-police, retired and am behind your ideas 100% , anything I can do I would like to help. I live in Franklin County, which voted down being a sanctuary city being the council is Democratic, a moonshine county giving up their guns is dumb. The South gave up their flag, their statues and now they want their guns, sounds like Hitler’s Germany.” Wrote another: “There had already been rumblings locally about a militia being formed last month. We started carefully and quietly assembling patriotic Americans who are prepared to defend freedom at all costs. In the past day those numbers have swelled. We have a very strong military presence here – more veterans and both active and retired LE than you can count. As of this evening, we’re talking about thousands of people that have expressed an interest in being a part of this movement.” Here’s the deal. Last week, we reported on how lawmakers over in Virginia were threatening to use the National Guard if members of local law enforcement refused to enforce laws passed in the state that they felt violated the second amendment. That’s what sparked things in Tazewell County, which said it isn’t going down without a fight. On top of calling themselves a second amendment sanctuary county, they’re also crafting a militia as well. The Virginia county has taken the movement that has swept across the state and added an element that is sure to trigger pro gun-grabbing politicians in the state.
Presiding Judge Rosemary M. Collyer of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) has given the FBI until January 10, 2020 to come up with a proposal that answers “irregularities” in its past actions.
In what The New York Times called an “extraordinary public order” the court response was to the “scathing” findings released last week by the Justice Department’s independent inspector general concerning the Bureau’s wiretapping of Carter Page during its Russia investigation.
Judge Collyer wrote: The frequency with which representations made by F.B.I. personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other F.B.I. applications is reliable.
FBI Director Christopher A. Wray called conduct described of “certain employees” in the IG’s report “unacceptable and unrepresentative of the F.B.I. as an institution.” Wray said he had ordered “more than 40 corrective steps” to address the problems uncovered during the IG’s investigation.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said, “The FISA system, to survive, has to be reformed.”
Though he at first said he had not found any political bias at the FBI, IG Horwitz told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee yesterday he had found bias that needs to be dealt with.
Watch the video as Glenn Beck points out the reason Democrats have been in such a rush to get to impeachment.
WASHINGTON—A secretive surveillance court issued a rare public order on Tuesday rebuking the FBI for its handling of warrant applications to wiretap Carter Page, a onetime Trump campaign foreign-policy adviser whose monitoring by the government has become the subject of significant public controversy.
Judge Rosemary Collyer, the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, wrote in the filing that a recent Justice Department watchdog report was “troubling” and described the behavior of the FBI as “antithetical to the heightened duty of candor” owed to the court by government agents.
“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable. The FISC expects the government to provide complete and accurate information in every filing with the Court,” Judge Collyer wrote.
The order could drastically reshape relations between the court and the Justice Department and could have ramifications for how some of the nation’s most sensitive intelligence programs are run. The court has long approved the overwhelming number of the government’s warrant applications and signed off on most of its surveillance activities, but in recent years it has begun to scrutinize them more closely. The rift over the matter of Mr. Page could heighten the court’s scrutiny of government surveillance.
Because of the nature of the court’s work in approving secret surveillance of people suspected of spying and terrorism, it operates in near total secrecy and rarely releases its filings or orders to the public.
The order follows the release earlier in December of a watchdog report that found serious lapses in the FBI’s handling of the warrant against Mr. Page. In the report, the Justice Department’s inspector general found that the FBI had withheld exculpatory material about Mr. Page from the court and made misleading statements about his relationship with another government agency.
Judge Collyer ordered the Justice Department to explain by Jan. 10 what steps it was taking to prevent such lapses in the future. The judge’s order also indicated it planned to release more secret material about the case in the coming weeks on its public docket, offering the possibility of additional insight into the government’s most secret surveillance programs.
The FBI has already said it planned to make several changes in the wake of the inspector general report, including overhauling its surveillance warrant process and its confidential human informant program. It also said it would take disciplinary action if warranted, as the inspector general referred certain FBI employees for possible disciplinary measures.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was set up in the 1970s to oversee the government’s national security apparatus after several landmark congressional investigations revealed the widespread use of wiretaps without court authorization by the FBI on national security grounds. Its members are sitting federal judges across the country who are designated by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to serve on the FISC.
The court has long been controversial. Because it operates in secrecy and deals almost entirely with classified national security matters, the public has little knowledge of its activities.
Civil libertarians have long accused the court of being a rubber stamp for the government, saying it doesn’t exercise meaningful oversight of U.S. spy agencies. Its defenders have argued that it serves an important function in approving national security surveillance.
In recent years, Congress has mandated more transparency for the court, requiring it to publish the number of orders that it approves, modifies or denies.
Since the information became available, denials have trended upward slightly. In 2015 and 2016, the court denied in full only 0.5% of applications it received, according to data from the court. In 2017, it jumped to about 1.5% of applications. Last year, the court denied in full about 1.8% of the roughly 1,300 applications it received.
USENIX Association 11th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation April 2–4, 2014 • Seattle, WA, USA Epsilon: A Visible Light Based Positioning System
Abstract Exploiting the increasingly wide use of Light-emitting Diode (LED) lighting, in this paper, we study the problem of using visible LED lights for accurate localization.The basic idea is to leverage the existing lighting infra-structure and apply trilateration to localize any devices with light sensing capability (e.g., a smartphone), using LED lamps as anchors. Through the design of Epsilon,we identify and tackle several technique challenges. In particular, we establish and experimentally verify the op-tical channel model for localization. We adopt BFSK and channel hopping to enable reliable location beaconing from multiple, uncoordinated light sources over the shared optical medium. We handle realistic situations towards robust localization, for example, we exploit us-er involvement to resolve the ambiguity in case of in-sufficient LED anchors. We have implemented the Epsilon system and evaluated it with a small scale hardware test bed as well as moderate-size simulations. Experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of Epsilon: the90th percentile accuracies are 0.4m, 0.7m and 0.8m for three typical office environments. Even in the extreme situation with a single light, the 90th percentile accuracy is 1.1m. We believe that visible light based localization is promising to significantly improve the positioning ac-curacy, despite few open problems in practice.
This is the most significant and important lawsuit of the 21st century, and it impacts the entire world. CEO’s and Founders Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Sergey Brin, Larry Page and Sandar Pichai are also named as defendants along with their companies.
IRREGULATORS vs. FCC: Exposing and prosecuting a vast, illegal financial scandal behind 5G Josh del Sol Beaulieu Watch this groundbreaking conversation with the IRREGULATORS embedded above or on YouTube here. This may be the most significant development since our 5G Crisis Summit, to redirect 5G in the United States. After you watch, please consider a contribution to the IRREGULATORS' grassroots funding campaign. -Josh del Sol Bruce Kushnick and W. Scott McCollough, Esq are good ‘ol boys who have seen it all. Now they’re coming back to take a stand for freedom. They’re also leading experts in the telecom industry who have mapped a pathway to restore the Internet to the human-friendly, benevolent ideals from which it started. As part of this redirection, they’re not afraid to call out the corruption of those who have hijacked it. Bruce and Scott lead the IRREGULATORS, a group of telecom industry experts and insiders who are taking the FCC to federal court in January 2020, armed with evidence — of an estimated $1 Trillion scandal — and strategy that could very well pave the way to a great restructuring of telecom and dissolution of the 5G agenda.
A Powerful Case: In Summary Bruce Kushnick is a career telecom analyst who helped invent things like call display and the first 3-digit services. Bruce has also been creating music and playing the piano for 63 years, including live performances at Carnegie Recital Hall. He’s entertaining, iconoclastic, barely sleeps and regularly meditates in his Brooklyn apartment. On the front lines for decades, Bruce has compiled an epic, 581-page tome called “The Book of Broken Promises: $400 Billion Scandal and Free the Net,” which he is now generously offering for free. (Download this powerful eBook FREE via the sidebar on right, or at irregulators.org.) After the interview, Bruce conveyed that many of their team of 11 experts have 30+ years of experience in the telecom industry. He sees their group in the mould of “The Seven Samurai”: highly-trained experts who have come together to join one last battle, quite possibly to save the Internet — and our freedom — in the United States. Scott McCollough is a career telecom legal expert, and former Assistant Texas Attorney General and Contract Consumer Advocate. Reminding me of “Red” from That 70s Show, Scott is a lovable Texan hardass with a big heart underneath. He also happens to know the legal side of telecom and utilities better than virtually anyone else in the nation. In the highlights compiled in the first 3 minutes of the interview, Scott outlined some key points in this scandal involving misappropriated funds which he estimates now totals a shocking $1 Trillion over the last 16 years: “We had a bait and switch. We paid for a bunch of fiber to the home, and now we’re getting 5G instead.” “We started this accounting thing not because we wanted to kill 5G, but because it was the right thing to do, once we figured out how badly local and intra-state wireline ratepayers were getting screwed.” In the interview, Bruce Kushnick reveals how they have obtained financial documents from Verizon NY — which has previously been quietly designated as New York’s official telecom utility — that clearly show several billion dollars per year in misappropriation and theft. Scott estimates the amount of funds that wireless giants are stealing from wireline ratepayers to be $60 Billion per year, and sees this as a cash cow that has illegally funded 5G deployments. “[The IRREGULATORS’ suit] is a knife in the heart of the underlying economics that currently drive 5G. “If we are successful… 5G cannot sustain itself on an economic basis if it has to pay its own way.”
What U.S. healthcare consumers and parents may not surmise is that many vaccines administered in the USA possibly could be made in China. Back in 2016, this was reported:
U.S. and European vaccine makers such as Merck & Co., GlaxoSmithKline plc, and Sanofi Pasteur SA maintain vaccine manufacturing operations in China, that this activity is on the rise, and that Western vaccine makers are also establishing joint venture partnerships with Chinese vaccine companies.  [CJF emphasis]
Furthermore, back in 2017, batches of DPT vaccines made by Changchun Changsheng were recalled!  The current vaccine scandal is over rabies vaccines for humans!  Even though the U.S. CDC and others claim no Chinese-made vaccines are administered in the USA, if I were a person inclined to receive a vaccine, I’d still ask that all important question, “Is it made in China?”, because we have found in our research you cannot trust the CDC and FDA when it comes to vaccines and the information both put out about vaccines as ‘safe’.
Court date: 12 December 2019 | Location: Royal Courts of Justice, London - Court 37 | Note: Day of the UK general election
https://youtu.be/gqPo7NUe3Ck?t=7830: "My court case is on the 12th of December 2019 in London. People ask me at what time. The answer is I have no idea, that will be announced closer to the date, but the court hearings typically take place between 10:00 am and 4:00 pm. So at some point in that six hour period.
Targeted Individuals Court Case, Time: December 6, 2019, 10am to 7pm
INTERNATIONAL APPEAL Stop 5G on Earth and in Space
There are 182,894 signatories from 207 nations and territories as of December 1st, 2019
To the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations
We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens from (__) countries, urgently call for a halt to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already in place. RF radiation has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.
From: ikqbot<email@example.com> Sunday, September 22, 2019 9:11 PM Just letting you know I have a monthly public outreach and awareness campaign going. It's every monday starting in Oct - Aug in Nj. Please let people know if they are interested. Best Regards, Krissy
Targeted Individual NJ Activism Schedule
Starting in October the first Monday of every month we will be spreading awareness in the most populated cities in NJ. This is an eleven month campaign leading to next years annual Targeted Individual day. On August 28, 2020 we will hold a protest/ rally in Trenton, NJ at the capitol and attend the NYC rally the next day.
Activism: Resolution Against the Use of Radiating Type Weapons for People
In September, October, November and December 2019, a number of events are planned at the United Nations in the Human Rights Committee and the Committee Against Torture.
The Moscow Committee for Housing Ecology sent to the UN a resolution of the International Conference (December 1-2, 2018) “Against the Use of Radiating Type Weapons for People”. The resolution contains a requirement for the UN - “to develop and adopt a Convention on the prohibition of weapons of a radiating type (non-lethal, psychotronic), as WMD”.
The draft Convention “On the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Radiating Type Weapons on Their Destruction” is attached to the resolution.
The UN sent the committee an invitation to the Conference on Events for Sustainable Development and Peace, held in December 2019.
We are asking you to: send a requirement to the UN: to adopt the Convention "On the Prohibition of Radiating Type Weapons".
This will be the most important UN event "to achieve sustainable development and peace on the planet."
Please forward our appeal to other human rights organizations.
$85 with shipping. Protect your brain! Cap with 4 layers of metal and one layer of blackout rubber fabric, two magnets and grounding strap and rubber mouse pad comes with hat.
The new cap has a tab connected to the metal fabric. You can put a grounding clip on this and the other end on a magnet or a piece of carbon and it is grounded. You can use it without a grounding strap. You can put more magnets on it and move them around to where your implants are or over your ears. If you get hot, you can put an ice pack inside. The head is the best place to cool the body. It comes with a large round rubber mouse pad you can take out if you want. The shielding works best if it blocks EMF and sound, so you need metal and rubber.
This is not guaranteed to stop V2K. If you hear voices, you may have a radio connection, a real radio connected to your brain and it is always connected. A hat will probably not stop that, but it may reduce the feedback they get.
Email: CitizensAHT@protonmail to order if overseas because extra shipping is incurred for tracking overseas and going through customs. Overseaes tracked and insured through customs is about $35-54. Uninsured is $24-27.
NEW BOOKLET: "How Are You Being Targeted?" Comes with free copy of WBAN press release (18 pages)
Booklet is $8.00 + $2.00 shipping. Overseas is $7.00 for shipping total $15.00. You will also receive a copy of the Press Release on the Body Area Network. You can support our organization's activities by ordering by email. We will send you an invoice. Pay by Paypal or debit/credit card at CitizensAHT@protonmail.com.
We focus on education/raisingpublic awarenessabout the RICO crimes of organized stalking, directed energy torture and other violations of physical/mental sovereignty andactionsyou can take to help win this war.
Hope Franklin, Research and Communications Director
TAX DEDUCTIBLE DONATION WITH PAYPAL: CitizensAHT@protonmail.com If you donate, please request the IRS Tax Number.
If you are having problems receiving your newsletter, try submitting another email address. Also, look in spam or trash folders or change settings in your email.
Please print a copy of this newsletter and any newsletters you wish to maintain. Just having them in your email won't save them. You can also copy them into a Word Document with .2 margins.
This is an internet reference newsletter.A link to the original article is provided in the colored title line. Articles are referenced based on the subject matter that may be of interest to victims of civil rights abuses, including electronic harassment and stalking. We claim no authorship, of these references, they are presented for your education and consideration of the information. The purpose is for TI education only. The reference may contain only part of the original article due to space limitations here. CAHT neither agrees with nor disagrees with any opinions or information contained herein. Please go to the link to read the complete article. Thank you.
The information provided on this web site and those it links to, including embedded videos and other content from other web sites, is for educational purposes only. The information and products made available through this web site are not intended to provide medical advice, diagnose, treat, or cure any health conditions, or be construed as a therapeutic recommendation or prescription for any disease or symptom. The US Food and Drug Administration has not evaluated products or statements about specific products, health topics, or any suggested methods presented. Viewers should not attempt self-diagnosis or self-treatment of any kind, and should not discontinue any medication or therapy or make any health-related decisions without the advice of a licensed medical physician. You should consult with a physician or healthcare professional before starting any diet, exercise, or supplementation program, before taking any medication or nutritional supplement, or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem. Each person is different, and the way you react to a particular product may be significantly different from the way other people react to such product. You should consult your physician or healthcare professional regarding any potential adverse interactions between medication you are currently taking and nutritional supplements before taking any such supplements. Citizens Against Harmful Technology disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of the use and application of the contents of this site. If you are unwilling to be bound by this disclaimer, you should not view this site or newsletter. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. We are not responsible for content written by and hosted on third-party websites. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. We assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.