Accomplished pharma prof thrown in psych hospital after questioning official COVID narrative
Fri Dec 11, 2020 - 7:35 pm EST
Jean Bernard Fourtillan, professor of pharmacology and toxicology and owner of 400 medical patents, spoke out about the origin of the SARS CoV virus. He claims the COVID-19 crisis was fabricated and is being used to impose a dangerous vaccine on the world population.
Early on December 10, Jean-Bernard Fourtillan was taken from his home by a team of French law enforcement officers and forcibly placed against his will in solitary confinement at the psychiatric hospital of Uzès.
You can write to the hospital administration here to complain at this outrageous, Soviet dissident-style treatment of Professor Fourtillan: firstname.lastname@example.org
'Hold Up': French coronavirus film gives floor to the 'usual suspects of conspiracy'
The CDC’s Medical Police State: The Right To Detain Anyone, Forced Medical Treatment, And Vaccinations
(No More Fake News) —Understand the implications of new CDC rules, if you want to know where the medical dictatorship is heading.
Arbitrary apprehension of citizens, detainment, forced medical treatment, vaccination.
Let me paint a scenario:
You live in a polluted city, so you have a low-level cough. On your flight to another state, the cough becomes worse because the air in the plane cabin is foul. Unknown to you, a passenger complains to a flight attendant. The passenger is a typical meddler. When you arrive at your destination, a health-agency employee is waiting at the gate for you. He apprehends you and takes you to a room, to decide whether you have a communicable disease. His first standard question—are you up to date on your vaccinations? And things go downhill from there…
It can get worse: the same story as above, except when the detained passenger is injected with a load of vaccines, he then becomes very ill, or even dies. Using plane passenger lists, health authorities search out and detain everyone who was on the flight, claiming the deceased passenger died as a result of a disease—not the vaccinations—and now all the passengers will be detained and “treated,” because they are “infected.”
The CDC is doubling down.
The agency is on the verge of expanding its power to detain and force medical treatment on anyone.
The new proposed CDC regulations are contained in the Federal Register dated August 15, 2016, under the heading, “Control of Communicable Diseases—Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.”
Reading between the lines, the stark message is: any person in the US suspected of carrying a serious communicable disease, even if his disease is in an “invisible” stage, can be detained, isolated, quarantined, and medically treated (e.g., forcibly vaccinated). Upon conditional release, the person can be monitored, and this can involve wearing electronic tracking devices.
Those are the broad strokes of the new policy, and, obviously, they’re broad enough to cover anyone.
Tortured linguistic gibberish from the CDC guarantees that any American can be assessed with a disease, justifying arrest. Force yourself to wade through the next paragraph, and you’ll get a feel for the lunatic bureaucratic doublespeak, and the loopholes through which the government can drive a truck:
“…to authorize the quarantine, isolation, or conditional release of an individual traveling interstate, CDC must reasonably believe that the individual is infected with a communicable disease in a qualifying stage…As defined by the statute, a ‘qualifying stage’ means that the communicable disease is in ‘a precommunicable stage, if the disease would be likely to cause a public health emergency if transmitted to other individuals’ or ‘a communicable stage’…it is necessary to define the precommunicable stage of a communicable disease to adequately inform the public of when quarantine, isolation, or conditional release may be authorized. HHS/CDC defines precommunicable stage to mean the stage beginning upon an individual’s earliest opportunity for exposure to an infectious agent and ending upon the individual entering or reentering the communicable stage of the disease or, if the individual does not enter the communicable stage, the latest date at which the individual could reasonably be expected to have the potential to enter or reenter the communicable stage…”
Notice the absurd Orwellian definition of “agreement”:
“…HHS/CDC believes that it is important to define for the public what is meant by the term ‘apprehension.’ Apprehension means the temporary taking into custody of an individual or group for purposes of determining whether quarantine, isolation, or conditional release is warranted…When an apprehension occurs, the individual is not free to leave or discontinue his/her discussion with an HHS/CDC public health or quarantine officer….In certain circumstances, the individual may remain apprehended pending confirmation that he or she is not infected or not reasonably believed to be infected with a quarantinable communicable disease…Generally, however, HHS/CDC does not expect that the typical public health apprehension will last longer than 72 hours…HHS/CDC is proposing a definition for ‘agreement’ which refers to an agreement entered into between the CDC and an individual expressing agreement between the parties that the individual will observe public health measures authorized under this part, as the CDC considers reasonably necessary to protect the public’s health, including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment.”
Translation: Any person can be arrested, held, and vaccinated, without his consent. That’s what “agreement” means.
And finally: “HHS/CDC has proposed a definition for ‘electronic or internet-based monitoring’ that defines this term as referring to mechanisms or technologies allowing for the temporary public health supervision of an individual under conditional release, including electronic mail, SMS texts, video conference or webcam technologies, integrated voice-response systems, entry of information into a web-based forum, wearable tracking technologies, and other mechanisms or technologies as determined by the Director or supervising health authority.”
Translation: Once released from custody, an individual can be monitored electronically, including by the attachment of tracking devices.
To prepare the public for this version of fascism, the CDC has been promoting a whole series of phony epidemics over decades, using scare tactics. SARS, MERS, bird flu, Swine Flu, West Nile, Ebola, Zika—they’ve all been duds. The CDC has only cared about one thing in this campaign: softening up the public to accept a medical police state.
The enemies of freedom are writing the future at this moment and erasing the past.
Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trial Shows Alarming Evidence of Pathogenic Priming in Older Adults
The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Briefing Document on the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine contains disturbing indications that might be a safety signal on pathogenic priming, especially in older adults.
In the development of vaccines against coronaviruses like SARS-COV-1 and MERS in the early 2000’s, researchers found evidence of a serious problem. Teams of U.S. and foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs.
This issue is well known. Early in the COVID-19 scenario, Dr. Peter Hotez, of Baylor College of Medicine, testified before Congress about the dangers of accelerating coronavirus vaccine development, saying “(The) unique safety problem of coronavirus vaccines” was discovered 50 years ago while developing the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine.”
He went to register that this “‘paradoxical immune enhancement phenomenon’ means vaccinated people may still develop the disease, get sicker and die.”
Researchers had seen this same “enhanced immune response” during human testing of the failed RSV vaccine tests in the 1950s. The vaccines not only failed to prevent infection; 80% of the children infected required hospitalization, and two children challenged with the RSV died (see Openshaw, 2005). In April of 2020, Hotez told CNN, “If there is immune enhancement in animals, that’s a showstopper.”
There’s been a serious terminology problem with this issue. The problem, of course, is not “immune enhancement,” which sounds like something helpful to the immune system. In fact, it is quite the opposite. The problem is, in reality “disease enhancement”; in fact, that is what it was called in the original RSV study. Disease enhancement now appears to be caused by initial exposure to a pathogen’s proteins, or parts of proteins, which primes the body to autoimmunity. That is “pathogenic priming.” In COVID-19, every protein in the SARS-CoV-2 has at least one epitope that matches human proteins someplace in the human body. About one-third of the epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 virus that match human proteins match immune system proteins.
Gates (in this video) is so worried about the danger of adverse events that he says vaccines shouldn’t be distributed until governments agree to indemnify against lawsuits. On Feb. 4, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, there were only 11 active CV cases in the U.S., yet the U.S. quietly pushed through federal regulations giving coronavirus vaccine makers full immunity from liability.
Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity
In SARS, a type of “priming” of the immune system was observed during animal studies of SARS spike protein-based vaccines leading to increased morbidity and mortality in vaccinated animals who were subsequently exposed to wild SARS virus. The problem, highlighted in two studies, became obvious following post-vaccination challenge with the SARS virus . found that recombinant SARS spike-protein-based vaccines not only failed to provide protection from SARS-CoV infection, but also that the mice experienced increased immunopathology with eosinophilic infiltrates in their lungs.
Similarly , found that ferrets previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV also developed a strong inflammatory response in liver tissue (hepatitis). Both studies suspected a “cellular immune response”.
These types of unfortunate outcomes are sometimes referred to as “immune enhancement”; however, this nearly euphemistic phrase fails to convey the increased risk of illness and death due to prior exposure to the SARS spike protein. For this reason, I refer to the concept as “pathogen priming”; the peptides with pathogenic potential therefore are referred to as “putative pathogenic priming peptides”.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Office of the Secretary
HHS IS SUBMITTING THIS DOCUMENT TO THE FEDERAL REGISTER FOR PUBLICATION. THE FORMATTING MAY CHANGE. THE VERSION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER WILL BE THE OFFICIAL VERSION.
ACTION: Notice of Declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for medical countermeasures against COVID-19.
SUMMARY: The Secretary is issuing this Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-6d) to provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19.
DATES: The Declaration is effective as of February 4, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert P. Kadlec, MD, MTM&H, MS, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Office of the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201; Telephone: 202-205-2882.
Plague of Liars: Nuremberg Code Outlaws Forced Medical Procedures, Which INCLUDES Mandatory Vaccinations Dec 15, 2020 (Anna Von Reitz, paulstramer.net) Some people might not be familiar with the verb “to dissemble”, but we all need to become familiar with it because there is a lot of dissembling going on. It basically means to deliberately conceal something or obfuscate it, so that one’s attention is misdirected or deflected from whatever the Dissembler wishes to obscure. Like the truth. And in this case, the truth about the Nuremberg Code and the protection it provides us from accepting any forced medical procedure or therapy at all. Together with casting doubts and slander, dissembling is one of the chief tools in the propagandist toolbox.
A few days ago, I wrote an article explaining that forced vaccinations are a violation of the Nuremberg Code. Note the word, “forced”. In fact, any forced medical procedure or therapy is against the Nuremberg Code. All medical procedures and therapies must have fully informed and freely given consent, to the greatest extent possible – which means that people who are conscious and able to decide things for themselves remain in control of their medical destiny.
The Code itself explains exactly what it applies to, and even though the cases giving rise to the Code arose from medical experiments in Concentration Camps and involved forced medical experimentation on unwilling subjects, the core of the Nuremberg Code rose to the occasion and outlawed all kinds of forced medical procedures and therapies. Not just experimental procedures.
Another good one to quote in their faces is their own cherished Roe vs. Wade decision, the excuse for allowing abortion on demand. My body, my choice. That applies to every aspect of your body, what you take out and what you put into it, too.
Here is an example of a dissembling ‘news’ article so that you can see exactly how they dissemble the actual important information and misrepresent it to mean something else: The same article draws attention to the fact that the Nuremberg Code doesn’t make vaccination illegal. Who said it did? They are deliberately creating a False Argument as a means to obfuscate.
The Nuremberg Code makes FORCED vaccination illegal – along with all other forced medical procedures and therapies. The Nuremberg Code doesn’t single out vaccinations or any other procedure or therapy – it outlaws all forced procedures and therapies with the same broad brush.
The Nuremberg Code gives you full standing, if they attempt to violate it and force any kind of involuntary or undisclosed vaccination on you by any means – whether by wrestling you to the ground or by threatening to deprive you of any other right or privilege, including the right to travel and use public facilities.
Article 6, Sections 1 and 3. Article 6, section 1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
The Nuremberg Code in fact consists of the following ten points, laid down in international law during one of the Nuremberg Trials (source: The Holocaust Encyclopedia).
On December 9, 1946, an American military tribunal opened criminal proceedings against 23 leading German physicians and administrators for their willing participation in war crimes and crimes against humanity. This case is known as the “Doctors Trial” (USA v. Karl Brandt et. al). On August 19, 1947, the judges of the tribunal delivered their verdict. But before announcing the guilt or innocence of each defendant, they confronted the difficult question of medical experimentation on human beings. Several German doctors had argued in their own defense that their experiments differed little from those conducted before the war by German and American scientists. Furthermore they showed that no international law or informal statement differentiated between legal and illegal human experimentation. This argument was a great concern to two US doctors who had worked with the prosecution during the trial, Dr. Andrew Ivy and Dr. Leo Alexander.
As a result, on April 17, 1947, Dr. Alexander submitted a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes. The memo outlined six points that defined legitimate medical research. The trial’s verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these points in a section entitled “Permissible Medical Experiments.”It also revised the original six points into ten, and these ten points became known as the “Nuremberg Code.” In the half century following the trial, the code informed numerous international ethics statements. Its legal force, however, was not well established. Nevertheless, it remains a landmark document on medical ethics and one of the most lasting products of the “Doctors Trial.”
Permissible Medical Experiments From the trial transcript The great weight of the evidence before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the diseaseor other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priorireason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solvedby the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Anyone who is involved in pushing through or carrying out mandatory vaccination programs ‘because Covid’ will be in breach of the Nuremberg Code and international law. As such they will have ‘gone Nazi’ and be personally liable in any future trials for crimes against humanity.
Capella 2 Satellite Picture Taking
Despite Clouds Or Darkness, New Satellite Can See Into Buildings
A few months ago, a company called Capella Space launched a satellite capable of taking clear radar images of anywhere in the world, with incredible resolution — even through the walls of some buildings.
And unlike most of the huge array of surveillance and observational satellites orbiting the Earth, its satellite Capella 2 can snap a clear picture during night or day, rain or shine.
“It turns out that half of the world is in nighttime, and half of the world, on average, is cloudy,” CEO Payam Banazadeh, a former system engineer at the NASA Jet Propulsion laboratory, told Futurism. “When you combine those two together, about 75 percent of Earth, at any given time, is going to be cloudy, nighttime, or it’s going to be both. It’s invisible to you, and that portion is moving around.”
On Wednesday, Capella launched a platform allowing governmental or private customers to request images of anything in the world — a capability that will only get more powerful with the deployment of six additional satellites next year. Is that creepy from a privacy point of view? Sure. But Banazadeh says that it also plugs numerous holes in the ways scientists and government agencies are currently able to monitor the planet.
“There’s a bunch of gaps in how we’re currently observing Earth from space — the majority of the sensors we use to observe earth are optical imaging sensors,” he said. “If it’s cloudy, you’re going to see the clouds, not what’s happening under the clouds. And if there’s not much light, you’re going to have a really hard time getting an image that is useful.”
By contrast, Capella can peer right through cloud cover, and see just as well in the daylight as in total darkness. That’s because instead of optical imaging, it uses synthetic aperture radar, or SAR.
SAR works similarly to how dolphins and bats navigate using echolocation. The satellite beams down a powerful 9.65 GHz radio signal toward its target, and then collects and interprets the signal as it bounces back up into orbit. And because the satellite is sending down its own signal rather than passively capturing light, sometimes those signals can even penetrate right through a building’s wall, peering at the interior like Superman’s X-ray vision.
Sterilize air & water with Ultraviolet LED
Ultraviolet LED lights kill 99.9 per cent of coronavirus pathogens in just 30 seconds and could sterilise rooms cheaply via air conditioning systems
Israel-based researchers studied effectiveness of ultraviolet LED lights
Found in 30 seconds the LED bulbs kill 99.9 per cent of coronavirus particles
This offers a readily available and cheap way to sterilise air and water systems
The researchers looked at how effective two wavelengths of light were at killing SARS-CoV-2m the coronavirus causing the current pandemic.
They found 265 nanometers (nm) light waves were the most effective at killing the virus, but bulbs with a wavelength of 285 nm, which are more readily available, were almost as efficient.
In less than 30 seconds, the 285 nm light is able to destroy 99.9 per cent of all virus pathogens, according to the study, published in the Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology.
Dynamics, a US-based electronics firm, unveiled a coronaviruskilling machine that sucks up germs and blasts them with high-intensity ultraviolet light.
Called Nanowave, the technology is capable of eliminating 99 per cent of the virus in less than two thousandths of a second.
The device consists of four motors that pulls air in at up to 300 litres and is capable of pushing the coronavirus free air more than 10 feet away from the system. Dynamics also designed the 'world's first' fully flexible UV-C lamp that is physically contorted in the device to provide ultra-high intensity UV-C radiation.
Nanowave is available for purchase in the US for $3,450 per unit.
EU-COALITION AGAINST CYBERTORTURE and Task Force
We are a non profit EU-COALITION AGAINST CYBERTORTURE and Task Force established to create awareness and more of Cybernetic Technology and electronic abuse, such as the illegal data collection and manipulation of humans via brain – machine – interfaces. Coined “Cybertorture” by the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture.
Treasonous policies have been put in place by the DOJ, FBI, law enforcement, Fusion Centers to legally permit covert use of radiation weapons and neuroweapons in Vendetta, Surveillance, non-consensual experimentation, electronic warfare field weapons testing on citizens. Are we in the middle of a cold civil war? Do we still have a Fourth Amendment and is the United States being run by an unconstitutional secret government? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rhLI89vXu4s9Hg0MYFvIhib0OwtPCrrw/view
Bill Binney on Katherine Horton's channel. At time stamp 44:34
Binney says regulations for classification of the U.S. government including NSA is under executive order 13526 section 1.7...he goes on to say that section 1.7 of that order makes it perfectly clear you cannot classify any evidence of crime, corruption, fraud, and says a few other things. I believe this executive order even says embarrassment of an agency cannot be classified. Oh my, how many laws have been broken making evidence classified.
Click on this executive order 13526 then scroll down to section 1.7 to read further. Also, below this link is the link to Bill Binney on Horton's channel. It is a recent video. If the link does not work, go to Horton's channel and click on the recent video December 3 with Binney. The President Executive Order 13526
NEW BOOKLET: "How Are You Being Targeted?" (on hand 200) Comes with free copy of WBAN press release
Booklet is $8.00 + $2.00 shipping. Overseas is $7.00 for shipping total $15.00. You will also receive a copy of the Press Release on the Body Area Network. You can support our organization's activities by ordering by email. We will send you an invoice. Pay by Paypal or debit/credit card at CitizensAHT@protonmail.com.
We focus on education/raisingpublic awarenessabout the RICO crimes of organized stalking, directed energy torture and other violations of physical/mental sovereignty andactionsyou can take to help win this war.
Hope Franklin, Research and Communications Director
If you would like to be added to list, please email CitizensAHT@protonmail.com
NOTE: These are for your reference only. We do not advocate for any theories, stories, persons, entities or organizations. If involved in seances, spiritism or criminal activities, they will be removed from this list.
FFTI & Targeted Justice Open Support Call Time: Begins at 9pm EST / 6pm PST every Thursday Call In #: 1- 515-606-5187 Call ID: 400014# www.freeconferencecall.com Breath of Life Bible Study Hosted by: Ordained Minister Barbara Hyseni Tuesdays and Thursdays 9 p.m. EDT 717-275-8940 Access Code 5724269
Moderator: Frank Targeted Massachusetts - STARS, International Time: 9:00 pm Eastern Call-in Number: 515-604-9715 Access Code: 708922
Church Conference Call Moderator: Dr. Millicent Black Time: 6 pm Eastern/ 5 pm Central/ 4 pm Mountain/ 3 pm Pacific Call-in number: 605-562-0444 Call ID: 140567 Pin number: 1#
Time 12:30 PM Pacific Call-in number: 515-739-6045 Access code number 874647 On Free Conference Call. Amy 971-207-3401
Moderator: Lorraine October 10, 2020 9 PM eastern Dial-in using your phone: United States: +1 717-275-8940 United States: +1 712-832-8330 Access code: 240 0170 https://hello.freeconference.com/conf/call/2400170 Moderator: FFTI Tonight: 10/10: Mr. Frank AllenTime: 9:00 pm EST/ 6 pm PST The first call will be 10/10/2020 Dial-in 602-580-9502 ID 5314877# Saturdays 7:00-9:00 p.m. Phone: 425-436-6200 Access Code: 128788
Moderators: Rev. Dr. Ralph and Catherine Sept
Sunday Service with Rev. Dr. Ralph and Catherine Sept Time: 4 PM Eastern/ 3 PM Central/ 2 PM Mountain/ 1 PM Pacific Call-in number: (605) 313-5111 Access code: 403529#
Citizens Against Harmful Technology
DONATIONS: Please make donations on our Website. https://www.citizensaht.org/
If you are having problems receiving your newsletter, try submitting another email address. Also, look in spam or trash folders or change settings in your email.
Please print a copy of this newsletter and any newsletters you wish to maintain. Just having them in your email won't save them. You can also copy them into a Word Document with .2 margins.
This is an internet reference newsletter.A link to the original article is provided in the colored title line. Articles are referenced based on the subject matter that may be of interest to victims of civil rights abuses, including electronic harassment and stalking. We claim no authorship, of these references, they are presented for your education and consideration of the information. The purpose is for TI education only. The reference may contain only part of the original article due to space limitations here. CAHT neither agrees with nor disagrees with any opinions or information contained herein. Please go to the link to read the complete article. Thank you.
The information provided on this web site and those it links to, including embedded videos and other content from other web sites, is for educational purposes only. The information and products made available through this web site are not intended to provide medical advice, diagnose, treat, or cure any health conditions, or be construed as a therapeutic recommendation or prescription for any disease or symptom. The US Food and Drug Administration has not evaluated products or statements about specific products, health topics, or any suggested methods presented. Viewers should not attempt self-diagnosis or self-treatment of any kind, and should not discontinue any medication or therapy or make any health-related decisions without the advice of a licensed medical physician. You should consult with a physician or healthcare professional before starting any diet, exercise, or supplementation program, before taking any medication or nutritional supplement, or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem. Each person is different, and the way you react to a particular product may be significantly different from the way other people react to such product. You should consult your physician or healthcare professional regarding any potential adverse interactions between medication you are currently taking and nutritional supplements before taking any such supplements. Citizens Against Harmful Technology disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of the use and application of the contents of this site. If you are unwilling to be bound by this disclaimer, you should not view this site or newsletter. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. We are not responsible for content written by and hosted on third-party websites. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. We assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.