"Americans thought that by getting vaccinated, they were getting a ticket back to their freedom, when it is actually a gateway to an obedience platform and potentially an execution platform if you are not obedient based on your score." - Karen Kingston, Biotech Analyst Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industries
See US Patent 2021/0082583 ABSTRACT An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to system and methods for anonymously selecting subjects for treatment against an infectious disease caused by a pathogen, comprising: 1. a plurality of electronic devices [implants] configured with instructions to generate an ID, when in proximity of another such electronic device, one or both of transmit said ID to said another electronic device and receive an ID from said another electronic device, generating a score based on a plurality of such received IDs,receiving information from a server, displaying relevant treatment instructions to said subjects based on received information; 2. at least one server comprising instructions for sending to said plurality of electronic devices information to display said relevant treatment instructions; where said at least one server or said electronic devices comprise instructions to generate a prediction of likelihood of a subject transmitting said pathogen, based on a score of the subject.
Requiring customers to be vaccinated can draw $5,000 fines starting soon in Florida
By Kirby Wilson
Herald/Times Tallahassee Bureau Updated September 01, 2021 Read more at:
Florida businesses and governments that require proof of COVID-19 vaccination from customers or members of the public will soon face $5,000 fines, according to a new Department of Health rule. Earlier this year, the Republican-led Florida Legislature passed a bill, SB 2006, banning businesses, governments and schools from requiring “vaccine passports” — essentially proof that people seeking their services have gotten a COVID-19 vaccine. In May, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed that bill into law. The legislation allowed the state’s Department of Health to issue fines “not to exceed $5,000 per violation.” On Aug. 27, the department filed a rule that lays out how it will enforce the measure. Businesses, governments and schools will be fined $5,000 “per individual and separate violation,” the rule states. That’s the maximum penalty allowed by law. Violators will be issued a notice of their infraction, and they’ll have a chance to appeal their fines, the rule says. Once a fine is finalized, entities will have 30 days to pay it. The rule will go into effect Sept. 16.
Under SB 2006, businesses and governments are allowed to mandate vaccinations for employees, but DeSantis has said he does not support such requirements. In hospitals and nursing homes, where protection against the virus is perhaps most critical, DeSantis has argued that vaccine mandates would exacerbate existing staffing shortages. Although several countries have implemented “vaccine passport” programs to encourage people to get shots, DeSantis has argued they are a violation of personal freedom. Before he signed SB 2006 into law, DeSantis also issued an executive order banning mandatory vaccinations at businesses.
Take the Shot or Get Fired?
Can a business require proof of vaccination for COVID-19?
Sample Documents to Prepare Yourself and Have Notarized
DECLARATION OF VACCINATION EXEMPTION
Pursuant to Senate Bill #942, Section 1, Chapter #7, under the title “Exemption From Immunization,” I hereby declare that I, as a guardian/parent having responsibility for myself/child, named ___________________, who is an adult/minor, withhold my consent and let it be known that said adult/minor is exempt from any and all immunizations and/or vaccinations on the grounds that such is contrary to my personal and/or religious beliefs.
SENATE BILL #942, SECTION I, CHAPTER 7
3380 – IN ENACTING THIS CHAPTER, ITS IS THE INTENT OF THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE:… (C) EXEMPTION FROM IMMUNIZATION FOR MEDICAL REASONS OR PERSONAL BELIEFS.
3385 – IMMUNIZATIONS OF A PERSON SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR ADMISSION TO A SCHOOL OR OTHER INSTITUTION…IF THE GUARDIAN, PARENT, OR ADULT WHO HAS ASSUMED RESPONSIBILITY FOR HIS OR HER CUSTODY AND CARE IN THE CASE OF A MINOR, OR THE PERSON SEEKING ADMISSION, FILES WITH THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY, A LETTER OR AFFIDAVIT STATING THAT SUCH VACCINATION IS CONTRARY TO HIS/HER BELIEFS…
Any school or medical authority which tries to enforce vaccination on children or anyone else is in violation of the laws of the United States, and may be subject to prosecution.
Amendment 14 of the United States Constitution:
“No state shall make or impose any laws which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States, nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property.”
Amendment 4 of the United States Constitution:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons shall not be violated.”
SUBSCRIBED AND AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS ____ DAY OF _____________, ______.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-207
__________________________ ________________ SIGNATURE DATE
____________________________ ________________ NOTARY PUBLIC
Q: What is a religious exemption? A religious exemption for vaccination is a written form certifying that the parent’s objection to immunization for religious reasons exempts the parent and child from state vaccination requirements. It is only necessary for use in Florida Public and private schools for kindergarten through grade 12. A religious exemption is for anyone who has a sincere religious conflict with vaccination. A religious objection may be expressly implied by religious denomination or it may be based on an individual’s own moral/spiritual conscience to live God’s Word. Q: What constitutes a religious conflict with vaccination? All vaccines are made in violation of God’s Word. Vaccines are made with toxic chemicals that are injected into the bloodstream by vaccination. All vaccines are made with foreign proteins (viruses and bacteria), and some vaccines are made with genetically engineered viral and bacterial materials.
A conflict arises if you believe that man is made in God’s image and the injection of toxic chemicals and foreign proteins into the bloodstream is a violation of God’s directive to keep the body/temple holy and free from impurities.
A conflict arises if you accept God’s warning not to mix the blood of man with the blood of animals. Many vaccines are produced in animal tissues.
A conflict arises if your religious convictions are predicated on the belief that all life is sacred. God’s commandment “Thou Shall Not Kill” applies to the practice of abortion. When you believe that the practice of abortion should not be encouraged or supported in any way, a conflict arises with the use of vaccines produced in aborted fetal tissue even though you did not have any other connection with the abortions from which the vaccines are derived.
Q: What religions qualify for religious exemption? The statutory language for Florida vaccine policy clearly states that religious exemption must be granted without question if vaccination conflicts with a person’s religious convictions. A religious objection may be expressly implied by religious denomination or it may be based on an individual’s own moral/spiritual conscience to live God’s Word. Agents acting on behalf of the state in vaccination matters are prohibited from requesting ANY administrative proof that explains the recipient’s religious belief or that proves membership in an “acceptable” or specific religion. The state may NOT discriminate between religious denominations and may NOT make judgments regarding religious convictions. Q: What specific scriptural teachings form the basis for religious objection to the practice of vaccination? The New Testament epistles provide an exposition of Christian teaching regarding ethical behavior. Christians think of life as a gift of God and the body as a marvelous work of divine creation to be reverenced as a temple of God (I Corinthians 3:16, 6:19). To keep the body/temple holy and clean from blemish, scripture warns against defiling the body. (I Corinthians 3:17, 2 Corinthians 7:1). There is no scriptural support for injecting poisons or any virus into the bloodstream to cure or prevent disease. The Old and New Testaments, however, are replete with references to keeping the body blemish-free so that we may have abundant life. https://kehoechiro.com/the-facts-about-religious-exemption-in-florida/ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Religious Exemptions - Applicability to Vegetarian Beliefs Caroline L. Kraus file:///C:/Users/SKIZIT~1/AppData/Local/Temp/Religious%20Exemptions%20-%20Applicability%20to%20Vegetarian%20Beliefs.pdf
Consider the 1992 Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which characterized the abortion right first recognized in Roe v. Wade as protecting “bodily integrity, with doctrinal affinity to cases recognizing limits on governmental power to mandate medical treatment or to bar its rejection.” As that quotation suggests, “bodily integrity” is a somewhat awkward way of referring to the right to control what goes into or out of one’s body. For example, in Winston v. Lee, the Court held that a state could not perform nonconsensual surgery on a robbery suspect to remove a bullet sought as evidence against him. In another case, the Supreme Court assumed that a competent adult has a constitutional right to refuse medical treatment, even if death would result.
Should the right to bodily integrity also protect against mandatory vaccination? We might be tempted to distinguish some of the bodily integrity cases as involving only paternalistic justifications for intrusions. One has a right to avoid unwanted medical care because it is, after all, one’s own health and life at stake. By contrast, mandatory vaccination aims to protect not only the person to be vaccinated but the community that would benefit from herd immunity.
Guest post by Lawrence Sellin and Anna Chen
China’s People’s Liberation Army believes that biological weapons, not nuclear weapons, are the key to global military dominance.
In our recent Gateway Pundit article, we described the 2005 and 2006 Chinese military publications by Colonel Ji-wei Guo, who advocated the use of biotechnology in developing new methods of waging war and recommended that military medical doctors be involved in creating bioweapons.
In his 2008 book, “Biological Outlook on War and Foresight of Biotechnology Supremacy,” Colonel Guo elaborated on the application of biotechnology in bio-based war, representing the “Third Leap” in military strategy: “The third leap includes biotechnology and related sciences that develop and grow on the basis of information technology (including advanced computer and communication), nano-science and other convergence technologies, where biotechnology and biomedical science (including genetic engineering), cognitive science (including cognitive neuroscience) are comprehensively applied. It will cause huge quantitative changes in the combat environment, combat methods, space-time relationship, military structure and function, and will eventually cause new qualitative changes, which will bring about profound changes in modern military history. The operational level change brought by this military transformation is the further extension of the theory of power control with modern biotechnology as the main feature.”
Colonel Guo’s comments did not just represent the random musings of one particular Chinese military officer, but were concepts embraced by China’s People’s Liberation Army and became embedded in its military doctrine.
In his 2012 article “Development of military biotechnology and the future of bio-based war,” Major General Fu-Chu He wrote:
“As an emerging technology, military biotechnology expands the concept of weaponry and equipment, and becomes an important driving force behind the weaponry and equipment development. In recent years, great breakthroughs have been made in many fields of military biotechnology, such as synthetic biology, brain-computer interface and brain control, biological materials, bio-inspired machinery, bio-fuels, bio-electronics, bio-computing and non-lethal weapons, leading to the birth of new operational concepts. In future wars, military biotechnology will promote the bio-based weaponry and equipment, bio-based forces and bio-based combat style.”
Major General Fu-Chu He was President of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Vice President of China’s Academy of Medical Sciences, an Alternate Member of the 18th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and Vice Director of Scientific and Technical Committee affiliated to Central Military Commission, which is China’s equivalent of the U.S. Department of Defense’s DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Major General Chen Wei is presently the Director of the Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences and presumed head of China’s biological warfare program.
She was placed in command of the “clean up” operation in Wuhan after local authorities lost control of the COVID-19 outbreak. She also led China’s effort to create a COVID-19 vaccine.
Published in 2014, Major General Chen Wei co-authored the book “Biotechnology Development Yearbook, 2013,” which described the major biotechnological advances and their impact on military medical science.
The book contained 10 sections with 25 specific biotechnological topics including gene manipulation, synthetic biology, gene sequencing, biotherapeutics, biomaterials, bioinformatics, bio-imaging, cloning, and neurobiology.
In 2016, the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan’s Science and Technology Military-Civilian Fusion Program was launched by the Scientific and Technical Committee affiliated with the Central Military Commission.
That program incorporated all Chinese universities, pharmaceutical companies and “civilian” research centers, like the Wuhan Institute of Virology, into the People’s Liberation Army’s biotechnology warfare effort.
It is not then surprising that Major General Chen Wei’s predecessor as Director of the Institute of Biotechnology and retired Vice President of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Major General Pei-Tang Huang became an independent director of Hualan Biological Bacterin Inc. on April 26, 2019.
Given the intensity of the military-civilian research fusion program, perhaps it is no coincidence that in the two to three months after Pei-Tang Huang’s appointment, the chief executive officers of twenty-three multinational and domestic pharmaceutical companies across China resigned or retired, including Sanofi, Roche, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb and General Electric Healthcare.
In April 2021, Hualan Biological Bacterin Inc. announced an exclusive agreement with the Russian government to produce 100 million doses of the Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine developed by the Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology of Russia’s Ministry of Health.
NATO is developing new forms of warfare to wage a “battle for the brain,” as the military alliance put it. The US-led NATO military cartel has tested novel modes of hybrid warfare against its self-declared adversaries, including economic warfare, cyber warfare, information warfare, and psychological warfare. Now, NATO is spinning out an entirely new kind of combat it has branded cognitive warfare. Described as the “weaponization of brain sciences,” the new method involves “hacking the individual” by exploiting “the vulnerabilities of the human brain” in order to implement more sophisticated “social engineering.” Until recently, NATO had divided war into five different operational domains: air, land, sea, space, and cyber. But with its development of cognitive warfare strategies, the military alliance is discussing a new, sixth level: the “human domain.” A 2020 NATO-sponsored study of this new form of warfare clearly explained, While actions taken in the five domains are executed in order to have an effect on the human domain, cognitive warfare’s objective is to make everyone a weapon. “The brain will be the battlefield of the 21st century,” the report stressed. “Humans are the contested domain,” and “future conflicts will likely occur amongst the people digitally first and physically thereafter in proximity to hubs of political and economic power.”
/ CBS/AP government-funded researchers tested AIDS drugs on hundreds of foster children over the past two decades, often without providing them a basic protection afforded in federal law and required by some states, an Associated Press review has found.
The research funded by the National Institutes of Health spanned the country. It was most widespread in the 1990s as foster care agencies sought treatments for their HIV-infected children that weren't yet available in the marketplace.
The practice ensured that foster children - mostly poor or minority - received care from world-class researchers at government expense, slowing their rate of death and extending their lives. But it also exposed a vulnerable population to the risks of medical research and drugs that were known to have serious side effects in adults and for which the safety for children was unknown.
The research was conducted in at least seven states - Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, Colorado and Texas - and involved more than four dozen different studies. The foster children ranged from infants to late teens, according to interviews and government records.
Several studies that enlisted foster children reported patients suffered side effects such as rashes, vomiting and sharp drops in infection-fighting blood cells as they tested antiretroviral drugs to suppress AIDS or other medicines to treat secondary infections.
In one study, researchers reported a "disturbing" higher death rate among children who took higher doses of a drug. That study was unable to determine a safe and effective dosage.
The government provided special protections for child wards in 1983. They required researchers and their oversight boards to appoint independent advocates for any foster child enrolled in a narrow class of studies that involved greater than minimal risk and lacked the promise of direct benefit. Some foster agencies required the protection regardless of risks and benefits.
Advocates must be independent of the foster care and research agencies, have some understanding of medical issues and "act in the best interests of the child" for the entirety of the research, the law states.
However, researchers and foster agencies told AP that foster children in AIDS drug trials often weren't given such advocates even though research institutions many times promised to do so to gain access to the children.
Illinois officials believe none of their nearly 200 foster children in AIDS studies got independent monitors even though researchers signed a document guaranteeing "the appointment of an advocate for each individual ward participating in the respective medical research."
New York City could find records showing 142 - less than a third - of the 465 foster children in AIDS drug trials got such monitors even though city policy required them. The city has asked an outside firm to investigate.
Likewise, research facilities including Chicago's Children's Memorial Hospital and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore said they concluded they didn't provide advocates for foster kids.
Some states declined to participate in medical experiments. Tennessee said its foster care rules generally prohibit enlisting children in such trials. California requires a judge's order. And Wisconsin "has absolutely never allowed, nor would we even consider, any clinical experiments with the children in our foster care system," spokeswoman Stephanie Marquis said.
Officials estimated that 5 percent to 10 percent of the 13,878 children enrolled in pediatric AIDS studies funded by NIH since the late 1980s were in foster care. More than two dozen Illinois foster children remain in studies today. Some foster children died during studies, but state or city agencies said they could find no records that any deaths were directly caused by experimental treatments.
Researchers typically secured permission to enroll foster children through city or state agencies. And they frequently exempted themselves from appointing advocates by concluding the research carried minimal risk and the child would directly benefit because the drugs had already been tried in adults.
"Our position is that advocates weren't needed," said Marilyn Castaldi, spokeswoman for Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in New York.
If they decline to appoint advocates under the federal law, researchers and their oversight boards must conclude that the experimental treatment affords the same or better risk-benefit possibilities than alternate treatments already in the marketplace. They also must abide by any additional protections required by state and local authorities.
Many of the studies that enrolled foster children occurred after 1990 when the government approved using the drug AZT - an effective AIDS treatment - for children.
Arthur Caplan, head of medical ethics at the University of Pennsylvania, said advocates should have been appointed for all foster children because researchers felt the pressure of a medical crisis and knew there was great uncertainty as to how children would react to AIDS medications that were often toxic for adults.
"It is exactly that set of circumstances that made it absolutely mandatory to get those kids those advocates," Caplan said. "It is inexcusable that they wouldn't have an advocate for each one of those children.
"When you have the most vulnerable subjects imaginable - kids without parents - you really do have to come in with someone independent, who doesn't have a dog in this fight," he said.
Those who made the decisions say the research gave foster kids access to drugs they otherwise couldn't get. And they say they protected the children's interest by carefully explaining risks and benefits to state guardians, foster parents and the children themselves.
"I understand the ethical dilemma surrounding the introduction of foster children into trials," said Dr. Mark Kline, a pediatric AIDS expert at Baylor College of Medicine. He enrolled some Texas foster kids in his studies, and doesn't recall appointing advocates for them.
"To say as a group that foster children should be excluded from clinical trials would have meant excluding these children from the best available therapies at the time," he said. "From an ethical perspective, I never thought that was a stand I could take."
Illinois officials directly credit the decision to enroll HIV-positive foster kids with bringing about a decline in deaths - from 40 between 1989 and 1995 to only 19 since.
NIH, the government health research agency that funded the studies, did not track researchers to determine if they appointed advocates. Instead, the decision was left to medical review boards made up of volunteers at each study site.
A recent Institute of Medicine study concluded those Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) were often overwhelmed, dominated by scientists and not focused enough on patient protections. An ethicist who served 22 years on such boards said they lack the resources to ensure the safety of foster children.
How To Legally Reject New Cell Towers & Antennas in Your Local Area
Resources to help you take local action
The Americans for Responsible Technology website contains a freely available 5G Activist Toolkit, which includes sample letters and flyers that can be customized and sent to your local officials, neighbors and schools, a sample small cell code for villages, towns and small cities, and information on successful lobbying and legislative outreach. It is a fantastic resource that we encourage everyone to explore to see how they can participate in making positive change in their local area!
It’s important to voice your concerns about the potential health hazards of radiation from nearby cell towers, but ART states that the most consistent winning strategy for fighting unwanted cell towers is arguing that the tower will impose an eyesore on your community, devalue nearby properties, and/or have a detrimental visual impact on surrounding historic areas.
They also emphasize ensuring that your local telecommunications ordinance is up-to-date and contains specific language to protect residents of your community from ill-sited 5G “small cell” antennas. They wrote a simple Checklist for Municipal Codes Addressing Small Cell Installations as a resource to help any local municipality cover their bases and create appropriately difficult hoops for telecoms to jump through that will ensure they don’t force their way into a community that doesn’t want or need their products and services.
How can you stay informed about proposals for future tower installations in your area? You can file a FOIL (Freedom of Information Law) request on your locality’s website. Ask to review all pending applications for wireless telecommunications facilities within a one-mile radius of your home. Contact your local clerk if you have questions or concerns about how to do this. To be able to take action against a new cell tower proposal, it’s best to know about it in advance, so this is an important step!
These are great ways to get started taking local action to keep your neighborhood free of unwanted radiation and environmental clutter. Please pass this information on to anyone you know who is interested and would benefit from it!
China May Have Secretly Built Two Exascale Supercomputers
China might have cemented its supercomputing supremacy with not one but two exascale computing systems.
The two machines were created at the National Supercomputing Center in Wuxi, China, an anonymous source told The Next Platform, a publication about the cloud and supercomputing industries. The computers — which are the Sunway “Oceanlite” system and the Tianhe-3 — allegedly hit 1.3 exaflops at their peak. If true, that would mark the first time a single supercomputer — let alone two — has hit the exascale threshold.
Exascale computers are systems that would be able to calculate a billion billion calculations per second, otherwise known as an exaflop. As of the time of reporting, no system has officially hit this goal. However, the report from Next Platform might be an indicator that China has hit it — but wants to keep it a secret.
Why would it want to do that? Well, both China and the US have historically had a cold relationship in terms of scientific and technological innovations with one another. It’s such a common occurrence that it became a major plot point in the bestselling novel and hit movie “The Martian.“
US Diplomats struck by ‘Havana Syndrome’ share agonizing symptoms of the condition which has left them BRAIN-DAMAGED and destroyed their careers, as they tearfully refute claims illness doesn’t exist
Three victims, diplomats Tina Onefur, Kate Husband, and Doug Ferguson, were all stationed at Cuba's capital when they came down with the mysterious malady
The three described their debilitating symptoms in detail during an interview with NBC News this week
The syndrome first surfaced at the embassy in Havana in 2016, months before Onefur, Husband, and Ferguson were diagnosed in 2017
It has since afflicted more than 200 Americans around the world, mostly diplomats and spies
Onefur sobbed as as she spoke and recalled the fact that she can now only work two hours a day from home after being diagnosed with the mysterious illness
Husband was diagnosed with brain damage by doctors in 2017 after symptoms associated with the syndrome, and was forced to medically retire
During her diagnosis, a doctor told Husband, after taking scans of her brain, 'it's like you aged 20, 25 years all at once'
By Alex Hammer For Dailymail.Com Published:
"When asked what the sensation felt like, Onefur said the pain was like nothing she had ever felt before in her life, and explained, ‘It was gripping - it was like I’d been seized by some invisible hand, and I couldn't move.’
When asked by interviewer Andrea Mitchell how her health is today, Onefur, choking back tears revealed that her symptoms were still as strong and prevalent as ever, even after more than four years.
'It's not easy to talk about our health because it's an invisible injury,' Onefur said,
'It's four-and-a-half years of of excruciating headaches, it's four-and-a-half years of stumbling losing my balance, four-and-a-half years of vision degradation,' Onefur asserts of the illness, while breaking down in tears"
Order your T-Shirts by email at CitizensAHT@protonmail.com
Pay by PayPal to email: CitizensAHT@protonmail.com
o In Email, state the size (S, M, L, XL) and whether you want male or female design. They are cut differently. Only White Color. o Please give name, address and phone. $20.00 Shipping included. o We have tried to select the most comfortable fabric. o Choose "Blue Man" or "Gravestone". The Gravestone is meant to show violations of human rights belong below ground, deceased, stopped, ended, no more death and destruction and rise to the human spirit of Targeted Individuals. Let the Truth Shine.
PLEASE SEND IN YOUR DONATIONS FOR CAHT'S ANNUAL EXPENSES Website, Monthly Newsletter ($45), Printing Booklets ($8 each), Brochures ($.75), Shielding for the Needy TI's
BOOKLET: "How Are You Being Targeted?"(on hand 200) Comes with free copy of WBAN press release
Booklet is $8.00 + $2.00 shipping. Overseas shipping is separate calculation by USPS. You will also receive a copy of the Press Release on the Body Area Network. You can support CitizenAHT's programs by ordering by email using Paypal or debit/credit card at CitizensAHT@protonmail.com. If you cannot afford a donation, you may ask to receive one at no cost (US only).
+13462487799,,5860095779#,,,,*470988# US (Houston)
+16699006833,,5860095779#,,,,*470988# US (San Jose)
Dial by your location
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C)
Meeting ID: 586 009 5779
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/keGiCkLMd
EPH: 6:12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
We focus on education/raisingpublic awarenessabout the RICO crimes of organized stalking, directed energy torture and other violations of physical/mental sovereignty andactionsyou can take to help win this war.
Hope Franklin, Research and Communications Director
CNN: Senator Susan Collins Slams CIA Over Suspected Directed Energy Weapons Attacks and the CIA’s failure to give adequate medical treatment to some of it's agents, who complained of symptoms related to directed energy attacks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDXbid5vX9E&t=9s
If you would like to be added to list, please email CitizensAHT@protonmail.com
NOTE: These are for your reference only. We do not advocate for any theories, stories, persons, entities or organizations. If involved in seances, spiritism or criminal activities, they will be removed from this list.
FFTI & Targeted Justice Open Support Call Time: Begins at 9pm EST / 6pm PST every Thursday Call In #: 1- 515-606-5187 Call ID: 400014# www.freeconferencecall.com
Breathe of Life Bible Study Ordained Minister Barbara Tuesdays and Thursdays @ 10 p.m. EST 717-275-8940 or 605-562-8401 or 712-832-8330 Access code: 5724269
Church Conference Call Moderator: Dr. Millicent Black Time: 6 pm Eastern/ 5 pm Central/ 4 pm Mountain/ 3 pm Pacific Call-in number: 605-562-0444 Call ID: 140567 Pin number: 1#
Time 12:30 PM Pacific Call-in number: 515-739-6045 Access code number 874647 On Free Conference Call. Amy 971-207-3401
Moderator: Lorraine October 10, 2020 9 PM eastern Dial-in using your phone: United States: +1 717-275-8940 United States: +1 712-832-8330 Access code: 240 0170 https://hello.freeconference.com/conf/call/2400170 Moderator: FFTI Tonight: 10/10: Mr. Frank AllenTime: 9:00 pm EST/ 6 pm PST The first call will be 10/10/2020 Dial-in 602-580-9502 ID 5314877# Saturdays 7:00-9:00 p.m. Phone: 425-436-6200 Access Code: 128788
Moderator: Mark V. Saturday 8:00 EST Dial In: 605-313-5111 Access Code: 717764#
The Military Veteran TI Group will hold its meeting this Sunday afternoon/evening on FreeConferenceCall. When: Sunday, September 5, 2021 Time: 8:00 PM Eastern/ 7:00 PM Central / 6:00 PM Mountain / 5:00 PM Pacific Call-in Number: 1-267-807-9497 Access Code: 248671#
Citizens Against Harmful Technology
DONATIONS: Please make donations on our Website. https://www.citizensaht.org/
If you are having problems receiving your newsletter, try submitting another email address. Also, look in spam or trash folders or change settings in your email.
Please print a copy of this newsletter and any newsletters you wish to maintain. Just having them in your email won't save them. You can also copy them into a Word Document with .2 margins.
This is an internet reference newsletter.A link to the original article is provided in the colored title line. Articles are referenced based on the subject matter that may be of interest to victims of civil rights abuses, including electronic harassment and stalking. We claim no authorship, of these references, they are presented for your education and consideration of the information. The purpose is for TI education only. The reference may contain only part of the original article due to space limitations here. CAHT neither agrees with nor disagrees with any opinions or information contained herein. Please go to the link to read the complete article. Thank you.
The information provided on this web site and those it links to, including embedded videos and other content from other web sites, is for educational purposes only. The information and products made available through this web site are not intended to provide medical advice, diagnose, treat, or cure any health conditions, or be construed as a therapeutic recommendation or prescription for any disease or symptom. The US Food and Drug Administration has not evaluated products or statements about specific products, health topics, or any suggested methods presented. Viewers should not attempt self-diagnosis or self-treatment of any kind, and should not discontinue any medication or therapy or make any health-related decisions without the advice of a licensed medical physician. You should consult with a physician or healthcare professional before starting any diet, exercise, or supplementation program, before taking any medication or nutritional supplement, or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem. Each person is different, and the way you react to a particular product may be significantly different from the way other people react to such product. You should consult your physician or healthcare professional regarding any potential adverse interactions between medication you are currently taking and nutritional supplements before taking any such supplements. Citizens Against Harmful Technology disclaim any liability, loss, or risk incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of the use and application of the contents of this site. If you are unwilling to be bound by this disclaimer, you should not view this site or newsletter. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. We are not responsible for content written by and hosted on third-party websites. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. We assume no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.